A SECRET WEAPON FOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXECUTIVE AND NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS CASE LAWS

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

The main target is to the intention to cause injury. This is a major trouble: a very small threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not implement, because the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, rather he has long been acquitted of your criminal charges based on evidence and it truly is effectively-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted in the criminal case, then on this incredibly charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment from the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all long run purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become set at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.

To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal guidance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed into the court in which the case continues to be or will be filed.

These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Permit the decision stand"—could be the principle by which judges are bound to such past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.

The case addresses A variety of issues like, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.

only on the ground of miscases remanded & only to the ground of misreading of evidence only on the ground of misreading of evidence get more info . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

six.  Mere involvement in the heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, given that then He's driving the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more demanded for further investigation, therefore, his ongoing incarceration would not provide any advantageous purpose at this stage.

Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, can be a regulation that is based on precedents, that would be the judicial decisions from previous cases, fairly than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may perhaps search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

 Criminal cases Inside the common legislation tradition, courts decide the legislation applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and making use of precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. As opposed to most civil regulation systems, common legislation systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lessen courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same kind of case.

Section 489-F from the Pakistan Penal Code pertains to offenses involving copyright currency notes and cash. Its primary objective would be to control counterfeiting activities and maintain the sanctity of the national currency.

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.

Report this page